Generations of students and the reading public have been taught: (a) that it was Thomas Carlyle who called economics (political economy as it was known) "the dismal science" and (b) that he did so as a reaction to the pessimistic predictions of Malthus in relation to population growth and its consequences. I shall demonstrate that proposition (a) is true but proposition (b) is, strictly speaking, false. I shall also demonstrate that Carlye first used the term in the context of a debate which was unrelated to Malthus's writings on population (indeed unrelated to Malthus at all) and that the specific context is not only interesting but also uplifting. For both reasons, the origin of the term "dismal science" is worth exploring with students. ...
Debunking Economics - Revised and Expanded Edition, now including a downloadable supplement for cour...
There is no universally accepted definition of science that would fit the very differentiated field...
It is argued that in educating economists we should sacrifice some of the more technical aspec...
The term dismal science was first coined by Thomas Carlyle in 1849. The reason why Carlyle chose the...
While it is correct to say that Carlyle first applied the exact phrase “dismal science” to political...
Research Paper Number 965, ISSN 0819-2642, ISBN 0 7340 2623 4While it is correct to say that Carlyle...
Ben Fine and Dimitris Milonakis claim to find the source of the decay in modern economics in the ‘ma...
Two vastly dierent historical stages in wealth creation are the traditional one based on agriculture...
Two vastly dierent historical stages in wealth creation are the traditional one based on agriculture...
Peter Bauer has at least the satisfaction of seeing his grimmest prediction come true. As he feared ...
1. Why history of economic thought? Why indeed? The vast majority of economists seem to regard the h...
Is economics a science? This distinguished and provocative book calls into question the increasing t...
The teaching of microeconomics in first year has become something of a ritual with similar content b...
Adam Smith published The Theory of Moral Sentiments in 1759 and established the ethical foundation f...
Economic science and scientific explanation models. Economics was born under the sign of methodologi...
Debunking Economics - Revised and Expanded Edition, now including a downloadable supplement for cour...
There is no universally accepted definition of science that would fit the very differentiated field...
It is argued that in educating economists we should sacrifice some of the more technical aspec...
The term dismal science was first coined by Thomas Carlyle in 1849. The reason why Carlyle chose the...
While it is correct to say that Carlyle first applied the exact phrase “dismal science” to political...
Research Paper Number 965, ISSN 0819-2642, ISBN 0 7340 2623 4While it is correct to say that Carlyle...
Ben Fine and Dimitris Milonakis claim to find the source of the decay in modern economics in the ‘ma...
Two vastly dierent historical stages in wealth creation are the traditional one based on agriculture...
Two vastly dierent historical stages in wealth creation are the traditional one based on agriculture...
Peter Bauer has at least the satisfaction of seeing his grimmest prediction come true. As he feared ...
1. Why history of economic thought? Why indeed? The vast majority of economists seem to regard the h...
Is economics a science? This distinguished and provocative book calls into question the increasing t...
The teaching of microeconomics in first year has become something of a ritual with similar content b...
Adam Smith published The Theory of Moral Sentiments in 1759 and established the ethical foundation f...
Economic science and scientific explanation models. Economics was born under the sign of methodologi...
Debunking Economics - Revised and Expanded Edition, now including a downloadable supplement for cour...
There is no universally accepted definition of science that would fit the very differentiated field...
It is argued that in educating economists we should sacrifice some of the more technical aspec...